|
|
|
Sergeant |
454 Posts |
Enlisted On: 15.03.2017 |
|
|
|
29.05.2018, 10:57 |
|
I have to agree with starline. Time had shown that with little players a commander is rather negative. On our main server wake island it is possible to have a commander most of the time. no worry
But games without commander are often better. the players must learn to read minimap. where is an empty jet = bailer/jumper, where an empty boat or vehicle emerges are enemies. you have to do more and the game is more intense. Also, you can extend a game without commander. if china only has one flag and the opposing team rape them and has a commander, team china has bad chance. if they manage to find a detour or swim to the other side, the commander spot them and they are dead. without commander, the team has at least one chance to take new flags.
|
|
|
|
br>
|
|
Senior Aircraftman |
25 Posts |
Enlisted On: 22.05.2018 |
|
|
|
29.05.2018, 16:10 |
|
Fine, closed topic! Thank you Princess_Unicorn for your answer.
|
|
|
|
br>
|
|
Administrator |
712 Posts |
Enlisted On: 26.04.2017 |
|
|
|
04.07.2018, 17:53 |
|
gerrywar3 wrote:
I could play a lot and attract and populate the server, just spread the rumor that I returned, clearly in good times and bad.
You are by far the most shit Commander i have seen in the last time.
Same League as "Goldacius" -but you top it. Congrats!
|
|
|
|
br>
|
|
Senior Aircraftman |
25 Posts |
Enlisted On: 22.05.2018 |
|
|
|
05.07.2018, 19:13 |
|
If that would be a compliment, thank you!
|
|
|
Thanks 1 | |
|
br>
|
|
Administrator |
2085 Posts |
Enlisted On: 30.01.2016 |
|
|
|
09.07.2018, 12:12 |
|
gerrywar3 wrote:
If that would be a compliment, thank you!
It's not.
|
|
|
Thanks 1 | |
|
br>
|
|
Administrator |
5352 Posts |
Enlisted On: 31.01.2016 |
|
|
|
09.07.2018, 13:01 |
|
FYI Gerry, Google Translate mistranslates it completely. :'D
Like, totally opposite meaning.
Staff Officer S_h_a_r_k_93
|
|
All my contacts, social media and more! shark.lost-soldiers.org
|
Thanks 1 | |
|
br>
|
|
Senior Aircraftman |
25 Posts |
Enlisted On: 22.05.2018 |
|
|
|
10.07.2018, 15:29 |
|
Well, thank you for pointing that out. But if a moderator of this community, affords to discredit one of its members, no worries, I guess the rest; the compliments I!
|
|
|
|
br>
|
|
Administrator |
5352 Posts |
Enlisted On: 31.01.2016 |
|
|
|
10.07.2018, 18:53 |
|
Uhm, we are not discrediting Dillmann at all (as his is actually a sarcastic objection towards your "commanding skills", and we are pointing that out because you did not seem to get it).
If there's something we are implicitly discrediting instead it is your poor understanding of the English language and English sarcasm / jokes in general (as this is actually the second time that you mistranslate something we have written).
Best regards,
Staff Officer S_h_a_r_k_93
|
|
All my contacts, social media and more! shark.lost-soldiers.org
|
Thanks 1 | |
|
br>
|
|
Corporal |
326 Posts |
Enlisted On: 17.05.2017 |
|
|
|
11.05.2019, 10:47 |
|
I spend most of my time on either Oman or Vehicle Rotation, Wake just as a last resort.
I can spend all day on either of these two servers and never have enough for a commander, very often it's only 1v1
Maybe you are looking at this from the wrong perspective ?
With only 1 or 2 per side the best way to be able to actally fight the enemy is to be commander, otherwise you just follow the flags that the other person has taken down like a stats padding sort of musical chairs, while the other plays a game of run and hide.
Boring.
A game of Commander v Commander up's the stakes and is very enjoyable.
When you get the 10 people per side, you no longer need a Commander because you have enough people to spot the enemy over all of the map, also if there are more skilled players on one side than the other having no Commander evens it out a bit, like on Wake where the weaker team can't get off the boat because the Commander spots them and they get stomped on immediately.
I think only allowing Commander when there are more players per side is a wrong assumption.
|
|
|
|
br>