band-of-brothers band-of-brothers band-of-brothers band-of-brothers band-of-brothers band-of-brothers band-of-brothers band-of-brothers band-of-brothers band-of-brothers band-of-brothers band-of-brothers band-of-brothers band-of-brothers band-of-brothers band-of-brothers band-of-brothers

forumhead
Forum >> Servers >> BF2 #2 - Infantry Rotation » Proposal to change the settings of the Infantry Server
Sort:      1 2 3  » printview
Administrator
2545 Posts
Enlisted On: 31.01.2016

[LS] Rangers
09.03.2017, 20:09 

Hello everyone,

this thread is directed to all the Players that play on either of our Servers,
so to all of our entire enlisted Community.

Since the Infantry Server is not really well populated, I wanted to propose some changes that could help us start matches on this Server more easily; and basically let our Players have more fun that what they currently have on this Server.

First of all, the size of the maps.

It is really difficult to get a good match going in the Infantry Server, and also in the Vehicle one. But imagine playing infantry on a 64 scale map, with only 3 or 4 Players ... With vehicles you can have some fun and move quickly, but on foot you either get stuck in a loop of capping and uncapping flags, never facing the enemy, or you just get tired to be in such a big ass map with just two folks to hunt down in the enemy Team.

I propose to try to scale this Server down to 16 Players sized maps (also setting the maximum number of Players to 16 accordingly). This way it will be easier, I hope, to kickstart a match, and it will be generally more pleasant to play when there are just a few Players (at least the Server will move from the "empty" list to the "populated" one). Also squadding up and giving orders makes more sense in small maps, where you really have to think strategically on where and when to attack.

Secondly, the ticket and round numbers.

I propose to re-scale them as well: scale down the tickets to something like 100 - 100 tickets for some maps, 150 - 150 for others; and to increase the number of rounds from 1 to 2. This way we will have fast and intense close quarters fights that don't get boring quickly (and that is awesome for infantry!); the losing team has a chance to take the other side of the map in the following round (to get the "revenge"), you don't get stuck in the same never-ending match forever, and you also change from map to map quite quickly.

This in my opinion would yield a better experience and it's worth a test run, because for the moment the Infantry Server is probably one of the less popular we have. What are your thoughs?

Staff Officer Italy S_h_a_r_k_93 


https://i.imgur.com/iwPUBn7.png
  All my contacts, social media and more!    shark.lost-soldiers.org
Sergeant
493 Posts
Enlisted On: 01.12.2016


09.03.2017, 20:56 

Wouldn't be better 32 players?


Administrator
738 Posts
Enlisted On: 26.12.2016

[LS] Rangers
09.03.2017, 22:16 

Yea, it's worth a try. smiling A 16 Player Mapsize with 64 Players would be a total Mess. But its Fun :p. And can you Turn off the Nades? So People cant Nadespam? It is quite Annoying/Lame in my Opinion...


https://www.lost-soldiers.org/images/lsts.gif
Administrator
2545 Posts
Enlisted On: 31.01.2016

[LS] Rangers
09.03.2017, 22:34 

No wait, wait. I'll edit the post: when I said 16 players map size,
I also meant that 16 was going to be the maximum number of Players.

@EYELESS I think that if the change of direction turns out to be welcomed and the Server starts to actually fill itself over time, at some point we will think about making it bigger (32) and see if it scales up correctly or if it becomes less populated over time.

For the moment though, I feel that this way the Infantry Server isn't going far, and we (LS Members) don't have the numbers yet to be able to split and paddle all the five Servers.

Staff Officer Italy S_h_a_r_k_93 


https://i.imgur.com/iwPUBn7.png
  All my contacts, social media and more!    shark.lost-soldiers.org
Sergeant
493 Posts
Enlisted On: 01.12.2016


09.03.2017, 22:44 

Also server Gulf of Oman MINI would be cool, but that's just by the way.

Okay Shark, understand.

@Germany Galactic|Pegasus : Yeah I agree with you about the noobtube.


Junior Technician
106 Posts
Enlisted On: 28.12.2016


10.03.2017, 12:20 

Didnt even say anything to this mike amused
But nice youd agree to me amused


Sergeant
493 Posts
Enlisted On: 01.12.2016


10.03.2017, 13:01 

Shit sorry hahahaha! amused I got wrong in the names! Sorry guys Laugh

Post edited.


Administrator
2545 Posts
Enlisted On: 31.01.2016

[LS] Rangers
13.03.2017, 21:56 

So BOYZZZ and GALLSSS!?!

So far only feedback from 2 Members? (Clint I'm counting you out as you didn't give actual feedback I think, unless I'm reading your post in a different way than you do). Where's the rest of the Community? Where are the other Forumers!!! amused

Waiting for your valuable feedback, anyone reading.
Your words are all worth considering.

Staff Officer Italy S_h_a_r_k_93 


https://i.imgur.com/iwPUBn7.png
  All my contacts, social media and more!    shark.lost-soldiers.org
Senior Aircraftman
38 Posts
Enlisted On: 10.01.2017

[LS] Rangers
13.03.2017, 22:17 

I think 16 would be a good start, then we could look how it develops, maybe it just needs a kickstart.


http://www.lost-soldiers.org/images/lsts.gif
Thanks
2
Administrator
2545 Posts
Enlisted On: 31.01.2016

[LS] Rangers
13.03.2017, 22:26 

Lulu, my man! Thanks! smiling
/no homo

Staff Officer Italy S_h_a_r_k_93 


https://i.imgur.com/iwPUBn7.png
  All my contacts, social media and more!    shark.lost-soldiers.org
Sort:      1 2 3  » printview
Page Generated In 0.503266 Seconds

      Valid CSS!     Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional
loading enlist enlist_hover lost_pw_hover mo08 mo10 mo12 mo14 mo16 mo18 mo20 mo22 mo24 mo26 up up2 registerheader