|
|
|
Administrator |
5351 Posts |
Enlisted On: 31.01.2016 |
|
|
|
28.10.2016, 19:34 |
|
Do you mean it's not possible at the moment, because of its low priority; or that it's not possible to do it, stop? Cause I am pretty sure I've seen - not too sure here - some websites or softwares that would call on the Windows File Explorer and let you pick a list of files to upload / open / modify and such ...
So which of the two did you mean bud!?
Staff Officer S_h_a_r_k_93
|
|
All my contacts, social media and more! shark.lost-soldiers.org
|
|
br>
|
|
Administrator |
2085 Posts |
Enlisted On: 30.01.2016 |
|
|
|
28.10.2016, 19:47 |
|
S_h_a_r_k_93 wrote:
Do you mean it's not possible at the moment, because of its low priority; or that it's not possible to do it, stop? Cause I am pretty sure I've seen - not too sure here - some websites or softwares that would call on the Windows File Explorer and let you pick a list of files to upload / open / modify and such ...
So which of the two did you mean bud!?
Staff Officer S_h_a_r_k_93
Of course it's possible, most image hosting sites allow multi-file upload as do others like Facebook etc.
Unfortunately it would require a total redesign of the gallery both backend & frontend and I would have to learn some advanced PHP / JavaScript to code it as multi-file uploading code is not something I'm familiar with.
|
|
|
|
br>
|
|
Administrator |
2085 Posts |
Enlisted On: 30.01.2016 |
|
|
|
31.10.2016, 05:36 |
|
S_h_a_r_k_93 wrote:
Forgot this z-indexing problem as well:
It goes behind the maps section too.
Fixed.
Also, if this button is overlapping the main website body for you, then please increase your resolution
I've tested and only 1024 x 768 or lower will experience the overlapping. 1152 x 864 or higher will not
|
|
|
|
br>
|
|
Administrator |
5351 Posts |
Enlisted On: 31.01.2016 |
|
|
|
31.10.2016, 21:02 |
|
"Also, if this button is overlapping the main website body for you, then please increase your resolution"
I know dude! That picture had, like, 300% zoom! :blush:
It was just to show that it had issues, but you wouldn't notice otherwise on high res.
Sorry bruh!
Staff Officer S_h_a_r_k_93
|
|
All my contacts, social media and more! shark.lost-soldiers.org
|
|
br>
|
|
Administrator |
5351 Posts |
Enlisted On: 31.01.2016 |
|
|
|
13.11.2016, 21:08 |
|
Okay so, other than the fact that when you reply you should be sent to the post's #fragment isntead of the thread page ...
... this is harder to notice: when you add a reply to a page that has already got the maximum amount of posts (11), a new page gets created, but you're not redirected to it. Instead, you're redirected to the page that you were browsing.
Example: say I visit page 2 of a thread that has 4 full pages. If I post a new reply while on page 2, a new page - page 5 - will be created (because page 4 already contained 11 posts), but I will be redirected to page 2 again and so I'll have to click on page 5 to see my new post.
|
|
All my contacts, social media and more! shark.lost-soldiers.org
|
|
br>
|
|
Administrator |
2085 Posts |
Enlisted On: 30.01.2016 |
|
|
|
16.11.2016, 05:56 |
|
S_h_a_r_k_93 wrote:
Okay so, other than the fact that when you reply you should be sent to the post's #fragment isntead of the thread page ...
... this is harder to notice: when you add a reply to a page that has already got the maximum amount of posts (11), a new page gets created, but you're not redirected to it. Instead, you're redirected to the page that you were browsing.
Example: say I visit page 2 of a thread that has 4 full pages. If I post a new reply while on page 2, a new page - page 5 - will be created (because page 4 already contained 11 posts), but I will be redirected to page 2 again and so I'll have to click on page 5 to see my new post.
You are right, I was aware of a few issues with this but had kinda been ignoring it. I guess it's becoming more important as the forum activity continues to increase.
For stuff like this, could you please post it in the Web Development -> ...ues / Bugs To Fix / Plans Topic as it's a definite issue. Let's keep this topic for more general discussion about the website as opposed to bugs.
Cheers,
5tarLine
|
|
|
|
br>
|
|
Administrator |
5351 Posts |
Enlisted On: 31.01.2016 |
|
|
|
17.11.2016, 20:23 |
|
In my honest opinion the Battlerecorder links on the frontpage should open up a new tab on the Browser rather than using the same page.
|
|
All my contacts, social media and more! shark.lost-soldiers.org
|
|
br>
|
|
Administrator |
2085 Posts |
Enlisted On: 30.01.2016 |
|
|
|
18.11.2016, 12:35 |
|
S_h_a_r_k_93 wrote:
In my honest opinion the Battlerecorder links on the frontpage should open up a new tab on the Browser rather than using the same page.
Agreed, fixed.
|
|
|
|
br>
|
|
Administrator |
5351 Posts |
Enlisted On: 31.01.2016 |
|
|
|
20.11.2016, 12:15 |
|
Hey man, sup! When you get back online, would it be much trouble to edit these topics with any of these three strings? I know it's a bad practice to hardcode it, but it's really a small operation; I think we should state clearly on the Forum that those Servers are offline for a reason ... or that they're just offline ... or that they will be back.
(Auto resize: 380x562px, png)
Staff Officer S_h_a_r_k_93
|
|
All my contacts, social media and more! shark.lost-soldiers.org
|
|
br>
|
|
Administrator |
2085 Posts |
Enlisted On: 30.01.2016 |
|
|
|
26.11.2016, 10:30 |
|
S_h_a_r_k_93 wrote:
Hey man, sup! When you get back online, would it be much trouble to edit these topics with any of these three strings? I know it's a bad practice to hardcode it, but it's really a small operation; I think we should state clearly on the Forum that those Servers are offline for a reason ... or that they're just offline ... or that they will be back.
(Auto resize: 380x562px, png)
Staff Officer S_h_a_r_k_93
|
|
|
|
br>