forumhead
Forum >> Lost-Soldiers Community >> Community Discussion » Ventrilo vs. Teamspeak
Sort:      «  1 2 3 4  » printview
Administrator
2085 Posts
Enlisted On: 30.01.2016

[LS] Rangers
01.02.2017, 06:53 

RemyBE wrote:

Whatever you say fam wink


If Italy S_h_a_r_k_93 or Netherlands Rico946 want to make this a Community Vote then I'm happy to go with the outcome of that. If Teamspeak is what everyone wants and would increase active players as you have both said then I will apply for the license and temporarily hide Donation stuff on the site, then I will have to work on a new Teamspeak Server Status module for the site. It will be a pain in the arse but possible.

I wasn't aware that there was a Non-Profit License for Teamspeak.

https://www.lost-soldiers.org/images/lsts.gif
Senior Aircraftman
23 Posts
Enlisted On: 13.11.2016


01.02.2017, 05:28 

Whatever you say fam wink
Administrator
2085 Posts
Enlisted On: 30.01.2016

[LS] Rangers
31.01.2017, 23:02 

Belgero wrote:

I was agreeing with you until that last post Star. Can't help but notice the pretty sarcastic tone.
Never had any sound problems with TS3. Obviously it wouldn't be as popular among gamers if the sound quality was inferior.


No sarcasm, just facts.

I didn't say sound problems, I said lower sound quality which is certainly what I have experienced with Teamspeak.

Those Ventrilo vulnerabilities are for older versions which we do not use, either client side or server side and there are not nearly as many of them. Take a look at the search results yourself before sending a lmgtfy in future please.

Having looked into Teamspeak there is a Non-Profit License option: http://npl.teamspeakusa.com/ts3npl.php for self-hosting which could meet our needs but if you click through to "Continue to NPL Application" you will see that they even consider Donations as "profit"... Ridiculous when they are 100% spent towards our running costs. To apply for this license I would have to temporarily hide all Donation stuff on the site...

https://www.lost-soldiers.org/images/lsts.gif
Corporal
237 Posts
Enlisted On: 13.11.2016


31.01.2017, 22:36 

I was agreeing with you until that last post Star. Can't help but notice the pretty sarcastic tone.

Never had any sound problems with TS3. Obviously it wouldn't be as popular among gamers if the sound quality was inferior.

Concerning the look, it is true that TS3 looks more professional. However i don't really care cause I'm not in Ventrilo or TS3 to look at the program itself. It's for communicating ans that's all I care about.

I will continue to use Ventrilo, I just hope that it will be more frequently used.

Ps: goo.gl/sUhJb4







https://battlelog.co/bfhq.php?id=1817513943
Administrator
2085 Posts
Enlisted On: 30.01.2016

[LS] Rangers
31.01.2017, 22:02 

RemyBE wrote:

I understand this one... it would mean €20-30 more expenses a year...

Depends how many slots, could be significantly more. Either way, there's no point throwing good money away for the sake of it. Especially when Donations have only hit the monthly target once.
RemyBE wrote:

I don't think you're right on this one, never had any "bad sound quality" feelings on TS3...

That's nice, we don't all have the same ears either so not everyone will notice. My hearing ability is very strong.
RemyBE wrote:

What kind of "security" are you pointing at here?

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Teamspeak+3+vulnerabilties
RemyBE wrote:

Disagree, TS3 looks way better... Ventrilo is like '80s interface lol back to windows 98

Depends on your Windows Version / Desktop Graphics Settings. On Windows 10 it looks much better than the nasty TS3 UI to me:

https://s27.postimg.cc/ag6glkowz/vent.png
(Auto resize: 800x923px, png)

https://www.lost-soldiers.org/images/lsts.gif
Sergeant
486 Posts
Enlisted On: 01.12.2016


31.01.2017, 21:46 

RemyBE wrote:

[quote=5tarLine]
Whilst I do think your intentions are good, I feel like you are on a bit of a personal crusade against Ventrilo because you're a Teamspeak lover / Ventrilo hater. Teamspeak is really not good quality VOIP software as far as I'm concerned, if you get used to Vent you'll realise it's superior too. There are 5 main reasons why I prefer Ventrilo:
1) Financial, we host the Ventrilo Server ourselves, we'd have to pay for Teamspeak

I understand this one... it would mean €20-30 more expenses a year...
5tarLine wrote:

2) Sound Quality

I don't think you're right on this one, never had any "bad sound quality" feelings on TS3...
5tarLine wrote:

3) I already did a lot of work coding to integrate Ventrilo into the site

I understand this one, you have probably busted your ass off because of this...
5tarLine wrote:

4) Security Vulnerabilities in Teamspeak

What kind of "security" are you pointing at here? I don't think people are sending any virus through TS3? AND we're talking about private funny
5tarLine wrote:

5) Teamspeak's ugly interface

Disagree, TS3 looks way better... Ventrilo is like '80s interface lol back to windows 98


Well said, completely agree.
Corporal
237 Posts
Enlisted On: 13.11.2016


31.01.2017, 21:10 

Yes I like the open mindset star, thanks. wink well it indeed seems like there are two sides, one for ventrilo and one for ts3, I will accept ventrilo considering you're not the only one backing it up Laugh and like i said my major problem is solved (tx shark). smiling

https://battlelog.co/bfhq.php?id=1817513943
Thanks
2
Given By: ClintS, S_h_a_r_k_93
Senior Aircraftman
23 Posts
Enlisted On: 13.11.2016


31.01.2017, 20:58 

5tarLine wrote:


Whilst I do think your intentions are good, I feel like you are on a bit of a personal crusade against Ventrilo because you're a Teamspeak lover / Ventrilo hater. Teamspeak is really not good quality VOIP software as far as I'm concerned, if you get used to Vent you'll realise it's superior too. There are 5 main reasons why I prefer Ventrilo:
1) Financial, we host the Ventrilo Server ourselves, we'd have to pay for Teamspeak

I understand this one... it would mean €20-30 more expenses a year...
5tarLine wrote:

2) Sound Quality

I don't think you're right on this one, never had any "bad sound quality" feelings on TS3...
5tarLine wrote:

3) I already did a lot of work coding to integrate Ventrilo into the site

I understand this one, you have probably busted your ass off because of this...
5tarLine wrote:

4) Security Vulnerabilities in Teamspeak

What kind of "security" are you pointing at here? I don't think people are sending any virus through TS3? AND we're talking about private funny
5tarLine wrote:

5) Teamspeak's ugly interface

Disagree, TS3 looks way better... Ventrilo is like '80s interface lol back to windows 98
Thanks
3
Given By: Belgero, ClintS, EYELESS
Sergeant
486 Posts
Enlisted On: 01.12.2016


31.01.2017, 19:05 

5tarLine wrote:

[quote=EYELESS]Yay, any league bro?


Some tournaments & leagues for Source. Not 1.6. You?


Nice!
Yes, but not sure if you know them. ESL, Shifters, Undzwei smiling
Administrator
2085 Posts
Enlisted On: 30.01.2016

[LS] Rangers
31.01.2017, 19:03 

EYELESS wrote:

Yay, any league bro?


Some tournaments & leagues for Source. Not 1.6. You?

https://www.lost-soldiers.org/images/lsts.gif
Sort:      «  1 2 3 4  » printview

To Start Or To Reply To A Topic You Must Be Enlisted And Logged In!
Enlist Now
Login
Page Generated In 0.411156 Seconds

      Valid CSS!     Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional
mo08 mo10 mo12 mo14 mo16 mo18 mo20 mo22 mo24 mo26 up up2