Hello dsghsdf,

with 64 players you'll need 4 players to join you, I think. But even if you needed just 2, how do you imagine a 2 vs 2 fight on a 64 players map would be? I'll tell you what, boring! Is that what you guys want? :o

Staff Officer S_h_a_r_k_93 

nope not much going on in sf lately

hi all,
thanks for your server with rules and autoadmin.
but could you switch to 64 maps please?
32 is not bad for a change every once in a while but i think 64 is preffered.

thanks

Server has gone really quiet over the past 2 weeks.
I am not seeing much activity, are you?

Staff Officer S_h_a_r_k_93 

Let's see how this weekend goes; next week I'll probably consider increasing it. Somebody please add a reply to the thread on battlelog.co, today: http://battlelog.co/post.php?id=30997

Staff Officer S_h_a_r_k_93 

lets change it to 64 size map with 32 or 48 players.

Yeah, it's time for an increase. Next on the line is an increase of map size as well, but I still need feedback over battlelog.co's thread. I've gotten a couple of opinions from Players and one told me it's balanced like this, 32 size. There are some helicopters on some of the maps.

Let's leave it like this for the moment, see if the additional 8 slots get used or not.
Staff Officer S_h_a_r_k_93 

Can you increase the number of players? Lately, it is often full. Then you do not come in teh game

The SF Server has been active all day, performing really well overall. For much of the day it was around half full and currently nearly full, good job.

Well, let's put it like this: ours is the only 32 size Ranked SF Server at this point in time. Right now, there are two other EU Ranked Servers, 64 size. They're empty, ours is 20/24 right now and has been going up and down all day.

In my opinion we can build this Server both by having a group of dedicated SF Players kickstarting the matches, as well as having the map size / player cap follow the popularity of the Server: when there's demand for it, it means we're popular ⇨ increase the map size.

With smaller sizes that's true, you don't have the full playground to play with, but starting a Server is much easier and keeping it full, desirable, is easier I think. Eventually I have also asked for feedback on battlelog.co, regarding this size debate; I hope some battlelog.co Forumers will engage the discussion.

We will see, I am open to changes, I just want to discuss them properly, think them through.
Staff Officer S_h_a_r_k_93 

I agree with rico and 5tarLine. Most of the sf maps are not that big even in 64 map size. All the battlelog players are used to play with that size