|
|
|
Corporal |
237 Posts |
Enlisted On: 13.11.2016 |
|
|
|
24.01.2017, 06:30 |
|
5tarLine wrote:
[quote=Belgero]Yeah he was only rude to me, don't worry :'(
S_h_a_r_k_93 wrote:
No more shark cookies for 5tarLine.
That's for sure!!
How was I rude?
Sometimes there are changes that are worth making / necessary. This is not one of them, put your energy into something else ladies.
Sir yes sir!
|
|
https://battlelog.co/bfhq.php?id=1817513943
|
|
br>
|
|
Administrator |
5387 Posts |
Enlisted On: 31.01.2016 |
|
|
|
24.01.2017, 20:43 |
|
All my contacts, social media and more! shark.lost-soldiers.org
|
|
br>
|
|
Senior Aircraftman (Technician) |
78 Posts |
Enlisted On: 27.12.2016 |
|
|
|
28.01.2017, 09:50 |
|
>> USMC Jet Pilots Do Not Attack Grounded Aircraft At Airfield - This Includes Both Helis and the J-10's - The F-18 Is Not Protected
What if Airfield is neutral or US?
Answer may seem obvious but if I can't find it written anywhere - even in your clarification - it's worth asking.
|
|
|
|
br>
|
|
Administrator |
5387 Posts |
Enlisted On: 31.01.2016 |
|
|
|
28.01.2017, 21:52 |
|
The status of the flag does not matter. If it's neutral, and a J-10 is on the runway and a Chinese Players hops in, it's protected: USMC Jet Pilots cannot kill him when he's taking off. The same applies if there's a J-10 and the Airfield is currently capped by USA. If there's a F-18 though, and the flag is neutral or USA or even capped back by China, it is not protected cause it will count as a stolen USMC Jet.
5tarLine can confirm my statements.
Staff Officer S_h_a_r_k_93
|
|
All my contacts, social media and more! shark.lost-soldiers.org
|
Thanks 1 | |
|
br>
|
|
Administrator |
2085 Posts |
Enlisted On: 30.01.2016 |
|
|
|
28.01.2017, 21:54 |
|
S_h_a_r_k_93 wrote:
5tarLine can confirm my statements.
Staff Officer S_h_a_r_k_93
Beautiful, you took the words out of my mouth
|
|
|
|
br>
|
|
Administrator |
5387 Posts |
Enlisted On: 31.01.2016 |
|
|
|
28.01.2017, 21:59 |
|
Is that a copycat of another post of yours?
It's not the first time you write something like that.
Staff Officer S_h_a_r_k_93 reporting for duty Sir!
@CONbineHarvister The same applies to the China Attack & Transport Helicopters: they are always protected during take off, by attacks from the USMC Jet Pilots, regardless of the status of the Airfield flag. Currently though, the rules allow both China Heli(s) and Jets to be raped by USMC Helicopters.
|
|
All my contacts, social media and more! shark.lost-soldiers.org
|
|
br>
|
|
Senior Aircraftman (Technician) |
78 Posts |
Enlisted On: 27.12.2016 |
|
|
|
28.01.2017, 22:31 |
|
I won't suggest for it to be changed because I'm sure it's for a good reason, but it does seem odd that USMC jet pilots can't do anything, even if they're the ones holding the flag! Neutral is fair enough I guess.
I suppose it does make the rule easier to understand, less exceptions.
Also I think it'd be super helpful if all these clarifications are added to the original post. I was "privately" working on doing that but since I wasn't actually asked to, I was prepared for you to say 'no thanks'. If you want me to finish off the job and post it internally that can be arranged. No rules actually changed, just clarifications/more detailed.
|
|
|
Thanks 1 | |
|
br>
|
|
Administrator |
5387 Posts |
Enlisted On: 31.01.2016 |
|
|
|
29.01.2017, 00:12 |
|
CONbineHarvister wrote:
I won't suggest for it to be changed because I'm sure it's for a good reason, but it does seem odd that USMC jet pilots can't do anything, even if they're the ones holding the flag! Neutral is fair enough I guess.
No wait I'm not following you. The USMC Jet Pilots' ability to kill grounded aircraft is not affected by the status of the flag; they can, in fact, do something. For example they can rape a F-18 that is going to be stolen by a Chinese Pilot (for example when Airfield is actually capped by USCM).
Help is alwasy accepted buddy, I thought 5tarLine already added a link to his post above? Or perhaps I suggested him to do it. :'D Go ahead and post your work in Barracks, if that's where you meant. 5tarLine will review it when he has time to do so, and I will too.
Staff Officer S_h_a_r_k_93
|
|
All my contacts, social media and more! shark.lost-soldiers.org
|
Thanks 1 | |
|
br>
|
|
Administrator |
2085 Posts |
Enlisted On: 30.01.2016 |
|
|
|
29.01.2017, 00:16 |
|
CONbineHarvister wrote:
I suppose it does make the rule easier to understand, less exceptions.
Also I think it'd be super helpful if all these clarifications are added to the original post. I was "privately" working on doing that but since I wasn't actually asked to, I was prepared for you to say 'no thanks'. If you want me to finish off the job and post it internally that can be arranged. No rules actually changed, just clarifications/more detailed.
Exactly, we don't want overly complicated rules, they are complicated enough. Also, what happens if a pilot jumps in a J-10 or Chopper and 0.5 seconds later, Airfield is neutralised or captured, would it be fair that all of a sudden they can be attacked by a jet whilst powering up the engines? But mostly, to prevent confusion, jets don't attack grounded aircraft under any circumstances - unless it's a stolen US vehicle or F-18, I thought by not mentioning anything about who was controlling the flag it would be obvious that this isn't relevant but I guess not
Please send me a PM with your clarifications / additional detail and I'll use it to edit my OP. As S_h_a_r_k_93 said we welcome anyone who is willing to help with this stuff.
Cheers,
5tarLine
|
|
|
Thanks 2 | |
|
br>
|
|
Leading Aircraftman |
2 Posts |
Enlisted On: 11.02.2017 |
|
|
|
17.02.2017, 18:59 |
|
Я не знаю английский,Вопрос такой можно атаковать вертолет MEC на взлетной площадке при взлете?
|
|
|
|
br>