|
|
|
Administrator |
2085 Posts |
Enlisted On: 30.01.2016 |
|
|
|
30.01.2017, 02:58 |
|
S_h_a_r_k_93 wrote:
Hey I'd bump the referral points from 2 to 5 for Officers, and from 5 to 10 to Staff Officers. I would also increase the thank-yous to 25 for Officers, and 50 for Staff Officers, given the values that you can see in the regular Forum users' profile pages.
What do you think?
Too harsh on the referral points?
Staff Officer S_h_a_r_k_93
Sounds sensible to me. Edit as you see fit.
|
|
|
|
br>
|
|
Administrator |
5387 Posts |
Enlisted On: 31.01.2016 |
|
|
|
29.01.2017, 11:16 |
|
Hey I'd bump the referral points from 2 to 5 for Officers, and from 5 to 10 to Staff Officers. I would also increase the thank-yous to 25 for Officers, and 50 for Staff Officers, given the values that you can see in the regular Forum users' profile pages.
What do you think?
Too harsh on the referral points?
Staff Officer S_h_a_r_k_93
|
|
All my contacts, social media and more! shark.lost-soldiers.org
|
|
br>
|
|
Administrator |
2085 Posts |
Enlisted On: 30.01.2016 |
|
|
|
18.11.2016, 12:27 |
|
S_h_a_r_k_93 wrote:
By the way 5tarLine, don't you feel it's more logical to list Ranger at the top of the post, then Officer and then finally Staff Officer? Otherwise people will read a lot of high requirements when they really need to just start with Ranger and work their way up.
Agreed, fixed.
|
|
|
|
br>
|
|
Administrator |
5387 Posts |
Enlisted On: 31.01.2016 |
|
|
|
17.11.2016, 21:15 |
|
Welp this is very strict lol
Come on! The requirements for Ranger (it's the first Membership level) are not difficult after all!
By the way 5tarLine, don't you feel it's more logical to list Ranger at the top of the post, then Officer and then finally Staff Officer? Otherwise people will read a lot of high requirements when they really need to just start with Ranger and work their way up.
Right now it sounds like they need to work their way down! ahah
Staff Officer S_h_a_r_k_93
|
|
All my contacts, social media and more! shark.lost-soldiers.org
|
Thanks 1 | |
|
br>
|
|
Corporal |
237 Posts |
Enlisted On: 13.11.2016 |
|
|
|
17.11.2016, 16:42 |
|
Welp this is very strict lol
|
|
https://battlelog.co/bfhq.php?id=1817513943
|
|
br>
|
|
Administrator |
2085 Posts |
Enlisted On: 30.01.2016 |
|
|
|
24.06.2016, 11:56 |
|
<<R2>>Mrs wrote:
I thought as much but was putting it out there.
And uping my post count
I know some people don't like having their IP shown to others but the message only displays very briefly and it helps me pick out cheaters returning with dynamic iPs very quickly
Also, having someone else know your IP doesn't put you under a great risk of being hacked as most people seem to think.
|
|
|
|
br>
|
|
Leading Aircraftwoman |
10 Posts |
Enlisted On: 06.04.2016 |
|
|
|
24.06.2016, 11:35 |
|
I thought as much but was putting it out there.
And uping my post count
|
|
Transit umbra, lux permanet
|
|
br>
|
|
Administrator |
2085 Posts |
Enlisted On: 30.01.2016 |
|
|
|
24.06.2016, 09:44 |
|
<<R2>>Mrs wrote:
You can remove the IP part of the message from gcc
I know, but I want it there
|
|
|
|
br>
|
|
Leading Aircraftwoman |
10 Posts |
Enlisted On: 06.04.2016 |
|
|
|
24.06.2016, 09:24 |
|
You can remove the IP part of the message from gcc
|
|
Transit umbra, lux permanet
|
|
br>
|
|
Administrator |
2085 Posts |
Enlisted On: 30.01.2016 |
|
|
|
11.06.2016, 00:07 |
|
S_h_a_r_k_93 wrote:
You are playing with the same GUID you registered to this account?
Indeed I was; in April I had one GUID.
Now I changed my GGC's Account GUID with the one I seemingly have now, and lo and behold!!!
(Auto resize: 184x657px, png)
Great, I also made some changes on the GGC-Stream website.
Glad it worked out.
|
|
|
Thanks 1 | |
|
br>